On 07/12/2016 11:04 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt | 2016-07-12 10:24:16 [-0400]:
>
>> 4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
>> If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> I don't recommend to cherry-pick this. The symbol it selects
> (HAVE_ARM_TWD) has "depends
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 22:04:29 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt | 2016-07-12 10:24:16 [-0400]:
>
> >4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
> >If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> I don't recommend to cherry-pick this. The symbol it selects
> (HAVE_ARM_TWD
* Steven Rostedt | 2016-07-12 10:24:16 [-0400]:
>4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
>If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
I don't recommend to cherry-pick this. The symbol it selects
(HAVE_ARM_TWD) has "depends on SMP" in v4.1. In v4.4 there should be
AM43xx which is UP and also us
4.1.27-rt31-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
There is no reason to limit the TWD to be used on SMP kernels only if the
hardware has it available.
On Wandboard i.MX6SOLO, running PREEMPT-RT and cyclictes
4 matches
Mail list logo