Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Tue, 2014-03-11 at 11:54 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:56:23 -0400 > Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Thanks, I ran an allmodconfig, and you're right, the orinoco driver > > failed to compile on v3.2-rt. I ran allmodconfig on 3.10-rt and it > > passed fine. Seems that one

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 22:56:23 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > Thanks, I ran an allmodconfig, and you're right, the orinoco driver > failed to compile on v3.2-rt. I ran allmodconfig on 3.10-rt and it > passed fine. Seems that one of the headers there pulls in swait. > > Looking deeper, 3.10-rt has

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Tue, 11 Mar 2014 02:06:46 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > > I don't run a make allmodconfig as I do on my upstream work. Maybe I'll > > have to add that to the mix. > > You can enable all the affected code with: > > CONFIG_HERMES=m > CONFIG_ORINOCO_USB=m > CONFIG_USB_GADGET=m > CONFIG_USB_FUNC

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 14:14 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 + > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 + > > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 + > > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > Here's the new patch: > > > > > > Doesn'

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 + > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Here's the new patch: > > > > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it > > doesn't

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 + Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Here's the new patch: > > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it > doesn't compile. WTF? > Hi Ben, This is an old thread. Which kernel did you a

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > Here's the new patch: Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it doesn't compile. WTF? Ben. > From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] swait: Add a few more use

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 16:28:39 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Thank you for the fixups. I just did the same thing in the v3.12 tree. > The chunk you nuked is now in Dave's net tree as a0a9663dd214 ("net: make > neigh_priv_len in struct net_device 16bit instead of 8bit"). As it > describe

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

* Steven Rostedt | 2013-12-11 10:34:20 [-0500]: >As this chunck doesn't need to be in the stable branch, I'm just going >to nuke it. > >I'll even fix up the change log too. Thank you for the fixups. I just did the same thing in the v3.12 tree. The chunk you nuked is now in Dave's net tree as a0a9

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

Here's the new patch for 3.4-rt. -- Steve From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swait: Add a few more users The wait-simple queue is lighter weight and more efficient than the full wait queue, and may be used in atomic context on PREEMPT_RT. Fix

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

Here's the new patch for 3.8-rt. -- Steve From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swait: Add a few more users The wait-simple queue is lighter weight and more efficient than the full wait queue, and may be used in atomic context on PREEMPT_RT. Fix

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

Here's the new patch: From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 11:50:06 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] swait: Add a few more users The wait-simple queue is lighter weight and more efficient than the full wait queue, and may be used in atomic context on PREEMPT_RT. Fix up some places that

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

On Wed, 11 Dec 2013 08:25:29 -0600 Corey Minyard wrote: > This chunk doesn't seem to belong in this patch... You're right! I noticed this after I sent these out. This even caused a conflict, where I fixed it up. As this chunck doesn't need to be in the stable branch, I'm just going to nuke it

Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

This chunk doesn't seem to belong in this patch... diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h index 819923f..ba78526 100644 --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h @@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ struct net_device { unsigned char perm_addr[MA

[PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

3.4.72-rt90-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_usb.c | 2 +-

[PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

3.8.13.13-rt26-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_usb.c | 2

[PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions

3.10.22-rt20-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: stable...@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt --- drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco_usb.c | 2 +