[PATCH RT 4/7] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
3.2.82-rt119-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I

[PATCH RT 4/7] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
3.2.82-rt119-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local

[PATCH RT 4/7] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
3.4.112-rt144-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I

[PATCH RT 4/7] net: add a lock around icmp_sk()

2016-09-23 Thread Steven Rostedt
3.4.112-rt144-rc1 stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior It looks like the this_cpu_ptr() access in icmp_sk() is protected with local_bh_disable(). To avoid missing serialization in -RT I am adding here a local