On 2021-02-08 17:52, Avri Altman wrote:
>> The flow should be generic - isn't it?
>> Why do you need the entire flow to be vendor-specific?
>> Why not just the parameters vendor-specific?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Avri
>
> Hi Avri,
> This vops change was done as per the below mail thread
> discussion
> >> The flow should be generic - isn't it?
> >> Why do you need the entire flow to be vendor-specific?
> >> Why not just the parameters vendor-specific?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Avri
> >
> > Hi Avri,
> > This vops change was done as per the below mail thread
> > discussion where it was decided to
On 2021-02-01 14:01, nitir...@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 2021-01-31 19:32, Avri Altman wrote:
UFS specification allows different VCC configurations for UFS
devices,
for example,
(1)2.70V - 3.60V (For UFS 2.x devices)
(2)2.40V - 2.70V (For UFS 3.x devices)
For platforms
On 2021-01-31 19:32, Avri Altman wrote:
UFS specification allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
for example,
(1)2.70V - 3.60V (For UFS 2.x devices)
(2)2.40V - 2.70V (For UFS 3.x devices)
For platforms supporting both ufs 2.x (2.7v-3.6v) and
ufs 3.x (2.4v-2.7v),
>
> UFS specification allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
> for example,
> (1)2.70V - 3.60V (For UFS 2.x devices)
> (2)2.40V - 2.70V (For UFS 3.x devices)
> For platforms supporting both ufs 2.x (2.7v-3.6v) and
> ufs 3.x (2.4v-2.7v), the voltage requirements (VCC)
UFS specification allows different VCC configurations for UFS devices,
for example,
(1)2.70V - 3.60V (For UFS 2.x devices)
(2)2.40V - 2.70V (For UFS 3.x devices)
For platforms supporting both ufs 2.x (2.7v-3.6v) and
ufs 3.x (2.4v-2.7v), the voltage requirements (VCC) is 2.4v-3.6v.
6 matches
Mail list logo
