On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 02:07:44PM +0200, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Nicholas,
>
> Nicholas Mc Guire writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:56:31AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> >>
> >> > Note that this will trigger a chec
Hi Nicholas,
Nicholas Mc Guire writes:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:56:31AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>>
>> > Note that this will trigger a checkpatch WARNING
>> > "WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message"
>> >
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 03:39:57PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:56:31AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
>
> > Note that this will trigger a checkpatch WARNING
> > "WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message"
> > but comparing the oops with an without the one-li
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 05:56:31AM +0200, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote:
> Note that this will trigger a checkpatch WARNING
> "WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message"
> but comparing the oops with an without the one-line pr_err I would
> argue that it makes sense to include it:
Hi Nichol
Although it is very unlikely that the allocation during init would
fail any such failure should point to the original cause to allow
easier understanding of the ensuing null-pointer dereference splat.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire
---
Problem located with experimental coccinelle script
V2: R
5 matches
Mail list logo