Am 26.05.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Salah Triki:
> Code is more readable when using kmem_cache_zalloc instead of
> kmem_cache_alloc/memset.
I don't fully agree. You also have ignored my other comment on this patch.
Please note that the path you are patching is a hot path.
Thanks,
//richard
Am 26.05.2016 um 16:28 schrieb Salah Triki:
> Code is more readable when using kmem_cache_zalloc instead of
> kmem_cache_alloc/memset.
I don't fully agree. You also have ignored my other comment on this patch.
Please note that the path you are patching is a hot path.
Thanks,
//richard
Code is more readable when using kmem_cache_zalloc instead of
kmem_cache_alloc/memset.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki
---
fs/ubifs/super.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index 7034995..f509200 100644
Code is more readable when using kmem_cache_zalloc instead of
kmem_cache_alloc/memset.
Signed-off-by: Salah Triki
---
fs/ubifs/super.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index 7034995..f509200 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
4 matches
Mail list logo