On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:45:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:43:44 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
>> > When trying to capture perf data on a system running spejbb2013,
>> > perf hung for about
Em Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:45:49AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Don,
>
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:43:44 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> > When trying to capture perf data on a system running spejbb2013,
> > perf hung for about 15 minutes. This is because it took that
> > long to gather about 10,00
Hi Don,
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:43:44 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> When trying to capture perf data on a system running spejbb2013,
> perf hung for about 15 minutes. This is because it took that
> long to gather about 10,000 thread maps and process them.
>
> I don't think a user wants to wait that l
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:43:44AM -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> When trying to capture perf data on a system running spejbb2013,
> perf hung for about 15 minutes. This is because it took that
> long to gather about 10,000 thread maps and process them.
>
> I don't think a user wants to wait that lon
When trying to capture perf data on a system running spejbb2013,
perf hung for about 15 minutes. This is because it took that
long to gather about 10,000 thread maps and process them.
I don't think a user wants to wait that long.
Instead, recognize that thread maps are roughly equivalent to
pid
5 matches
Mail list logo