On Wednesday 05 September 2012 09:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/05/2012 02:02 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 02:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/29/2012 09:01 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
init data f
On 09/05/2012 02:02 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 September 2012 02:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 08/29/2012 09:01 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>> Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
>>> init data for platform i.e. without any user-supplied constraints.
On Wednesday 05 September 2012 02:17 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 08/29/2012 09:01 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
init data for platform i.e. without any user-supplied constraints.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan
Tested-by: Stephen Warr
On 08/29/2012 09:01 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
> init data for platform i.e. without any user-supplied constraints.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan
Tested-by: Stephen Warren
Note that this patch depends on the patch I just pos
On 08/29/12 08:01, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
init data for platform i.e. without any user-supplied constraints.
I think this looks OK now, although I would like to test it, and check
for any interactions etc. with the other TPS6586x p
Register all TPS6586x regulators even if there is no regulator
init data for platform i.e. without any user-supplied constraints.
Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan
---
Changes from V1:
Stephen pointed out that the pointer in if should be same what it
is used inside the if statements.
Making the chan
6 matches
Mail list logo
