hi, Greg
thanks for your reply.
On 2016/2/7 15:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
From: Pan Xinhui
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-lo
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 03:42:52PM +0800, Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
> Reviewed-b
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 15:42:52 +0800
Pan Xinhui wrote:
> From: Pan Xinhui
>
> There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
> gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
> traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
Reviewed-by: Ala
From: Pan Xinhui
There is one filed gsm->num to store mux's index of gsm_mux[]. So use
gsm->num to remove itself from gsm_mux[] instead of the for-loop
traverse in gsm_cleanup_mux().
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui
---
change from V1:
lock is also held for the if()
---
drivers/tty/n_gsm.c |
4 matches
Mail list logo