Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-06-24 Thread Wei Yang
This has really been a long time, not sure we have any concern on this? This change looks good to me which make the numa emulation more robust. And David has acked. Welcome any comments on this. On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove

Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-06-24 Thread Wei Yang
This has really been a long time, not sure we have any concern on this? This change looks good to me which make the numa emulation more robust. And David has acked. Welcome any comments on this. On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove

Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-06-05 Thread Wei Yang
Ping~ Willing to hear some feed back :-) On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()" hits a >problem in numa_emulation. The reason is numa_nodes_parsed is not set >correctly after emulation. > >This patch set

Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-06-05 Thread Wei Yang
Ping~ Willing to hear some feed back :-) On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:04:50PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote: >My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()" hits a >problem in numa_emulation. The reason is numa_nodes_parsed is not set >correctly after emulation. > >This patch set

[PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-05-02 Thread Wei Yang
My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()" hits a problem in numa_emulation. The reason is numa_nodes_parsed is not set correctly after emulation. This patch set tries to fix this and also with two code refine. Detailed discussions are in this thread:

[PATCH V2 0/3] Refine numa_emulation

2017-05-02 Thread Wei Yang
My previous patch "x86/mm/numa: Remove numa_nodemask_from_meminfo()" hits a problem in numa_emulation. The reason is numa_nodes_parsed is not set correctly after emulation. This patch set tries to fix this and also with two code refine. Detailed discussions are in this thread: