On 17-02-17, 15:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Viresh Kumar writes:
>
> > An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
> > performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
> > supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will
On 17-02-17, 15:22, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Viresh Kumar writes:
>
> > An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
> > performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
> > supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
> > easier to
Viresh Kumar writes:
> An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
> performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
> supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
> easier to understand for all. The
Viresh Kumar writes:
> An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
> performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
> supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
> easier to understand for all. The bindings can be decided and
On 17 February 2017 at 06:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-02-17, 09:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The first 5 patches update the PM domain and QoS frameworks to support
>> that and the last one presents the front end interface to it.
>
> @Kevin and Ulf,
>
> Is there
On 17 February 2017 at 06:38, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-02-17, 09:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> The first 5 patches update the PM domain and QoS frameworks to support
>> that and the last one presents the front end interface to it.
>
> @Kevin and Ulf,
>
> Is there something wrong with this series?
On 09-02-17, 09:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The first 5 patches update the PM domain and QoS frameworks to support
> that and the last one presents the front end interface to it.
@Kevin and Ulf,
Is there something wrong with this series? Its been 7 weeks since this
series is getting posted and I
On 09-02-17, 09:11, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The first 5 patches update the PM domain and QoS frameworks to support
> that and the last one presents the front end interface to it.
@Kevin and Ulf,
Is there something wrong with this series? Its been 7 weeks since this
series is getting posted and I
Hi,
An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
easier to understand for all. The bindings can be decided and merged
later.
The bindings
Hi,
An earlier series[1] tried to implement bindings for PM domain
performance states. Rob Herring suggested that we can actually merge the
supporting code first instead of bindings, as that will make things
easier to understand for all. The bindings can be decided and merged
later.
The bindings
10 matches
Mail list logo