On 11/05/16 18:28, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Rob, Mark,
>>
>> On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform
>>> drivers for all interrupt controllers.
>>
>> Yes, that is
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 05:53:43PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rob, Mark,
>
> On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> > A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform
> > drivers for all interrupt controllers.
>
> Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether t
Hi Rob, Mark,
On 11/05/16 17:30, Rob Herring wrote:
> A platform driver for just gic-400 is wrong IMO until we have platform
> drivers for all interrupt controllers.
Yes, that is fine with me, but can we decide on whether the platform
driver should match "tegra210-agic" or the early driver should
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 11/05/16 17:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 11/05/16 16:51, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>>> wrote:
Hi Jon,
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
On 11/05/16 17:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 11/05/16 16:51, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
On 11/05/16 17:08, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 11/05/16 16:51, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Jon,
>>>
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
Hi Rob,
On 11/05/16 16:51, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, thoug
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
>>> Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, though I agree that's also not
>>> fantastic for extending PM
On 08/05/16 13:25, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Geert,
>
> On 07/05/16 15:10, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, though I agree th
Hi Geert,
On 07/05/16 15:10, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
>>> Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, though I agree that's also not
>>> fantastic for extending PM su
Hi Jon,
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
>> Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, though I agree that's also not
>> fantastic for extending PM support beyond Tegra 210 and variants
>> thereof.
>>
>> So maybe th
Hi Mark,
On 28/04/16 10:55, Mark Rutland wrote:
[...]
> The "nvidia,tegra210-agic" string can be taken as describing any
> Tegra-210 specific integration quirks, though I agree that's also not
> fantastic for extending PM support beyond Tegra 210 and variants
> thereof.
>
> So maybe the best ap
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 09:11:03AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 27/04/16 18:38, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >>
> >> On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra sp
Hi Jon,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jon Hunter wrote:
> On 27/04/16 18:38, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> [snip]
>>> I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra specific clock names
>
On 27/04/16 18:38, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra specific clock names
>> to the GIC DT docs. However, in that case, then poss
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra specific clock names
>> to the GIC DT docs. However, in that case,
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 04:34:53PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra specific clock names
> to the GIC DT docs. However, in that case, then possibly the only
> alternative is to move
On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
[snip]
I am not sure if it will be popular to add Tegra specific clock names
to the GIC DT docs. However, in that case, then possibly the only
alternative is to move the Tegra AGIC driver into its own file and
expose the GIC APIs for it
On 22/04/16 12:22, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:12:57PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>
>> On 22/04/16 11:00, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
interru
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:12:57PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 22/04/16 11:00, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> >> The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
> >> interrupt controller.
> >
> > The cover letter sa
On 22/04/16 11:00, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
>> interrupt controller.
>
> The cover letter says it _is_ a GIC-400, just used in a slightly unusual
> manner (i.e. not d
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 12:03:56PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
> interrupt controller.
The cover letter says it _is_ a GIC-400, just used in a slightly unusual
manner (i.e. not directly connected to CPUs).
> The Tegra AGIC requ
On 20/04/16 12:03, Jon Hunter wrote:
> The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
> interrupt controller. The Tegra AGIC requires two clocks, namely the
> "ape" (functional) and "apb2ape" (interface) clocks, to operate. Add
> the compatible string and clock information f
The Tegra AGIC interrupt controller is compatible with the ARM GIC-400
interrupt controller. The Tegra AGIC requires two clocks, namely the
"ape" (functional) and "apb2ape" (interface) clocks, to operate. Add
the compatible string and clock information for the AGIC to the GIC
device-tree binding do
24 matches
Mail list logo
