Re: [PATCH V2 14/19] tick-sched: add comment about 'idle_active' in tick_nohz_idle_exit()

2014-04-21 Thread viresh kumar
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 04:50 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > It's still over-detailed. Much of the above is easily deduced after common > review. OTOH > I proposed to summarize there: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/11/334 > The below disambiguates it a bit further. Hmm.. Something broke for sure

Re: [PATCH V2 14/19] tick-sched: add comment about 'idle_active' in tick_nohz_idle_exit()

2014-04-21 Thread Frederic Weisbecker
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:25:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The sequence of calls for dynticks CPUs is a bit confusing. Add a comment in > tick_nohz_idle_exit() to mention it clearly. All information required is in > commit and this conversation with Frederic. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/

[PATCH V2 14/19] tick-sched: add comment about 'idle_active' in tick_nohz_idle_exit()

2014-04-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
The sequence of calls for dynticks CPUs is a bit confusing. Add a comment in tick_nohz_idle_exit() to mention it clearly. All information required is in commit and this conversation with Frederic. https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/355 Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar