On Tuesday 22 April 2014 04:50 AM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> It's still over-detailed. Much of the above is easily deduced after common
> review. OTOH
> I proposed to summarize there: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/11/334
> The below disambiguates it a bit further.
Hmm.. Something broke for sure
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:25:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> The sequence of calls for dynticks CPUs is a bit confusing. Add a comment in
> tick_nohz_idle_exit() to mention it clearly. All information required is in
> commit and this conversation with Frederic.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/
The sequence of calls for dynticks CPUs is a bit confusing. Add a comment in
tick_nohz_idle_exit() to mention it clearly. All information required is in
commit and this conversation with Frederic.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/10/355
Suggested-by: Frederic Weisbecker
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
3 matches
Mail list logo