Hi Jassi,
On 03/16/2016 12:16 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
[...]
>> Alright, i will drop this check since it is causing a lot more
>> confusion
>>
> It's confusing because you check ti_msgmgr_queue_get_num_messages()
> also in ti_msgmgr_last_tx_done() which doesn't make sense because the
> former accoun
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> Jassi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Jassi,
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Ma
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Jassi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>> On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>>
>>> +
Jassi,
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
>> +static int ti_msgmgr_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> +static int ti_msgmgr_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = chan->mbox->dev;
>>
On 03/07/2016 12:31 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> Hi Jassi,
>>
>> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
>> On 03/03/2016 11:18 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/mailbox/Makefile| 2 +
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:05 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Hi Jassi,
>
> Thanks for reviewing the patch.
> On 03/03/2016 11:18 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>
>>> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 11 +
>>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile| 2 +
>>> drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c | 657
>
>> Do you wan
Hi Jassi,
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
On 03/03/2016 11:18 PM, Jassi Brar wrote:
[...]
>>
>> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 11 +
>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile| 2 +
>> drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c | 657
> Do you want to call it something more specific than 'msgmgr from TI'?
> Maybe its
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 3:54 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Support for TI Message Manager Module. This hardware block manages a
> bunch of hardware queues meant for communication between processor
> entities.
>
> Clients sitting on top of this would manage the required protocol
> for communicating w
Support for TI Message Manager Module. This hardware block manages a
bunch of hardware queues meant for communication between processor
entities.
Clients sitting on top of this would manage the required protocol
for communicating with the counterpart entities.
For more details on TI Message Manag
11 matches
Mail list logo
