On 6/26/19 10:09 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/SCPI.
> So add an optional func-id to let smc mailbox driver could
> use smc SiP
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 10:32:27AM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:09 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:27:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:44 AM Florian Fainelli
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:09 AM Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:27:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:44 AM Florian Fainelli
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > > >>> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:27:41PM -0500, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:44 AM Florian Fainelli
> wrote:
> >
> > On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> > >>> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/SCPI.
> > >>> So add an optional func-id to let smc mailbox driver
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 11:44 AM Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/SCPI.
> >>> So add an optional func-id to let smc mailbox driver could
> >>> use smc SiP func id.
> >>>
> >> There is no end to conforming
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
> >>> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/SCPI.
> >>> So add an optional func-id to let smc mailbox driver could
> >>> use smc SiP func id.
> >>>
> >> There is no end to conf
On 6/26/19 10:05 AM, André Przywara wrote:
>> So I introduced interrupt in V2. In my testcase, after smc call done,
>> it means firmware->smc mailbox->firmware done. Interrupt notification
>> from firmware->Linux, means firmware has done the operation.
>>
>> When using interrupts, we could not know
i ; , Sascha Hauer ;
>> dl-linux-imx ; Shawn Guo ;
>> feste...@gmail.com; Devicetree List ; Linux
>> Kernel Mailing List ;
>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Andre Przywara
>> ; van.free...@gmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM S
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 01:31:15PM +, Peng Fan wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:30 AM Peng Fan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jassi
> > >
> >
On 6/26/19 6:31 AM, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> The firmware driver might not have func-id, such as SCMI/SCPI.
>>> So add an optional func-id to let smc mailbox driver could
>>> use smc SiP func id.
>>>
>> There is no end to conforming to protocols. Controller drivers should
>> be written having no particu
On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 8:31 AM Peng Fan wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:30 AM Peng Fan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Jassi
> > >
> > > >
Hi All,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:30 AM Peng Fan wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jassi
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> > >
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 2:30 AM Peng Fan wrote:
>
> Hi Jassi
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote:
> > >
> > > From: Peng Fan
> > >
> > > Thi
Hi Jassi
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted
> > data via an ARM smc (secure
Hi Sudeep,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:21:09AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> > >
> > >
om; Devicetree List ; Linux
> Kernel Mailing List ;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Andre Przywara
> ; van.free...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote:
> >
> > From: Peng Fa
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 3:28 AM wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan
>
> This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data when it
> returns execution
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 10:21:09AM +, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:05PM +0800, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan
> > >
>
Hi Sudeep,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:05PM +0800, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted
> > data vi
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 04:30:05PM +0800, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data whe
On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:59:04 +
Peng Fan wrote:
Hi,
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > Hi Andre,
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> > >
> > > On Mon, 3 J
Hi Andre,
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> Hi Andre,
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:32:42 -0700
> > Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 01:32:49 +
Peng Fan wrote:
Hi Peng,
[ ... ]
> > > > +
> > > > + irq_count = platform_irq_count(pdev);
> > > > + if (irq_count == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > > > + return irq_count;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (irq_count && irq_count != val) {
> > > > +
Hi Andre,
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:32:42 -0700
> Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On 6/3/19 1:30 AM, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan
> > >
> > >
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 09:32:42 -0700
Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
> On 6/3/19 1:30 AM, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> > via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> > is implem
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] mailbox: introduce ARM SMC based mailbox
>
> On 6/3/19 1:30 AM, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> > From: Peng Fan
> >
> > This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted
> > data via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) inst
On 6/3/19 1:30 AM, peng@nxp.com wrote:
> From: Peng Fan
>
> This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
> via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
> is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data when it
> returns executi
From: Peng Fan
This mailbox driver implements a mailbox which signals transmitted data
via an ARM smc (secure monitor call) instruction. The mailbox receiver
is implemented in firmware and can synchronously return data when it
returns execution to the non-secure world again.
An asynchronous recei
28 matches
Mail list logo
