On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 9:52 PM Lai Jiangshan
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:28 PM Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:59:09PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > > latch_tree_find() should be protected by caller via RCU or so.
> > > When it find a node in an attempt, t
On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:28 PM Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:59:09PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > latch_tree_find() should be protected by caller via RCU or so.
> > When it find a node in an attempt, the node must be a valid one
> > in RCU's point's of view even the
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 03:59:09PM +, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> latch_tree_find() should be protected by caller via RCU or so.
> When it find a node in an attempt, the node must be a valid one
> in RCU's point's of view even the tree is (being) updated with a
> new node with the same key which is
latch_tree_find() should be protected by caller via RCU or so.
When it find a node in an attempt, the node must be a valid one
in RCU's point's of view even the tree is (being) updated with a
new node with the same key which is entirely subject to timing
anyway.
Cc: Paul E. McKenney
Cc: Oleg Nest
4 matches
Mail list logo