On 22 February 2013 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:44:23 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> If you don't like this one then we can add another entry
>> into struct policy like: gov_sysfs_parent.
>
> I don't know. This is going to look kind of ugly this way or another I
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:44:23 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 05:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> >> +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> >> + bool
> >> +
> >
> > So I suppose some architectures will
On 22 February 2013 05:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
>> + bool
>> +
>
> So I suppose some architectures will select this, right?
Yes. And they have to enable have_multiple_policies too
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
> for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
> Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
>
> Reported-by: Borislav
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
Reported-by: Borislav
On 22 February 2013 05:23, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
+config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
+ bool
+
So I suppose some architectures will select this, right?
Yes. And they have to enable have_multiple_policies
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:44:23 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 22 February 2013 05:23, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Monday, February 11, 2013 01:20:02 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
+config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
+ bool
+
So I suppose some architectures will select
On 22 February 2013 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:44:23 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
If you don't like this one then we can add another entry
into struct policy like: gov_sysfs_parent.
I don't know. This is going to look kind of ugly this way or
have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3
have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
Reported-by: Borislav Petkov b...@alien8.de
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
10 matches
Mail list logo
