Hi Jaehoon,
On 01/04/2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
not with 'using_phy'.
And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
But it's still working fine w
Hi Jaehoon,
On Wednesday 04 January 2017 06:04 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
> To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
> not with 'using_phy'.
>
> And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
> But
On 01/05/2017 02:50 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:34:34PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
>> To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
>> not with 'using_phy'.
>>
>> And if someone use the old dt
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 7:35 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>
> This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
> To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
> not with 'using_phy'.
>
> And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
> But it's still
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 09:34:34PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
> To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
> not with 'using_phy'.
>
> And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
> But it's still
This patch is for using PHY generic framework.
To maintain backward compatibility, check whether phy is supported or
not with 'using_phy'.
And if someone use the old dt-file, display the "deprecated" message.
But it's still working fine with it.
Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung
---
Changelog on V2:
6 matches
Mail list logo