Re: [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize opp table

2014-05-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 21 May 2014 17:05, Inderpal Singh wrote: > I guess you wanted to say "cpu core code" instead of "cpufreq core". > Correction may be needed here and in the subsequent patches as well. When I started implementation, I added code to cpufreq core's init routine and later moved it to base/cpu.c ..

Re: [PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize opp table

2014-05-21 Thread Inderpal Singh
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > OPP tables are already initialized for all CPUs by cpufreq core and so we > don't > need to reinitialize them from arm_big_little_dt driver. > I guess you wanted to say "cpu core code" instead of "cpufreq core". Correction may be needed here

[PATCH V2 4/7] cpufreq: arm_big_little: don't initialize opp table

2014-05-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
OPP tables are already initialized for all CPUs by cpufreq core and so we don't need to reinitialize them from arm_big_little_dt driver. Also, as the arm_big_little_dt driver doesn't have a .init_opp_table() callback anymore, make it optional in arm_big_little driver. Cc: Sudeep Holla Signed-off