On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Ulf Hansson (2018-12-03 05:38:35)
> > + Stephen, Mike, Graham
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > There is one a big difference while comparing with clocks,
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Ulf Hansson (2018-12-03 05:38:35)
> > + Stephen, Mike, Graham
> >
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > There is one a big difference while comparing with clocks,
Quoting Ulf Hansson (2018-12-03 05:38:35)
> + Stephen, Mike, Graham
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> There is one a big difference while comparing with clocks, which make
> this more difficult.
>
> That is, in
Quoting Ulf Hansson (2018-12-03 05:38:35)
> + Stephen, Mike, Graham
>
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> There is one a big difference while comparing with clocks, which make
> this more difficult.
>
> That is, in
+ Stephen, Mike, Graham
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Sure, but the ordering of locks is always subdomain first and then master.
> > > Considering the case of Qcom, we have
+ Stephen, Mike, Graham
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 12:06, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Sure, but the ordering of locks is always subdomain first and then master.
> > > Considering the case of Qcom, we have
On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +static int _genpd_reeval_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> > + unsigned int state, int depth);
> > +
>
> I don't like forward declarations
On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > +static int _genpd_reeval_performance_state(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
> > + unsigned int state, int depth);
> > +
>
> I don't like forward declarations
On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Sure, but the ordering of locks is always subdomain first and then master.
> > Considering the case of Qcom, we have two domains Cx (sub-domain) and Mx
> > (master).
> >
> > On first genpd_power_on(Cx)
On 30-11-18, 11:18, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > Sure, but the ordering of locks is always subdomain first and then master.
> > Considering the case of Qcom, we have two domains Cx (sub-domain) and Mx
> > (master).
> >
> > On first genpd_power_on(Cx)
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> > > updates to master domains that have their
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 10:59, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > >
> > > This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> > > updates to master domains that have their
On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> > updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
> > callback set.
> >
> > A genpd handles two type of
On 30-11-18, 10:44, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> > updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
> > callback set.
> >
> > A genpd handles two type of
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
> callback set.
>
> A genpd handles two type of performance states now. The first one is the
>
On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 at 09:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
> updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
> callback set.
>
> A genpd handles two type of performance states now. The first one is the
>
This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
callback set.
A genpd handles two type of performance states now. The first one is the
performance state requirement put on the genpd by the devices and
This commit updates genpd core to start propagating performance state
updates to master domains that have their set_performance_state()
callback set.
A genpd handles two type of performance states now. The first one is the
performance state requirement put on the genpd by the devices and
18 matches
Mail list logo
