On 09/02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> From: Viresh Kumar
> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:34:23 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PM / OPP: Prefix exported opp routines with dev_pm_opp_
>
> That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few
> routines didn't follow this, fix them.
>
>
On 02-09-15, 12:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 01-09-15, 21:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Is ..._free_table opposite of ..._init_opp? If so, you might want to
> > name them such that it is clear...
>
> Yes, it is opposite of that. Okay, so here is a new patch for this,
> lemme know if this looks
On 01-09-15, 21:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is ..._free_table opposite of ..._init_opp? If so, you might want to
> name them such that it is clear...
Yes, it is opposite of that. Okay, so here is a new patch for this,
lemme know if this looks fine. I will then resend the whole series
again..
On 01-09-15, 21:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Is ..._free_table opposite of ..._init_opp? If so, you might want to
> name them such that it is clear...
Yes, it is opposite of that. Okay, so here is a new patch for this,
lemme know if this looks fine. I will then resend the whole series
again..
On 02-09-15, 12:52, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 01-09-15, 21:03, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Is ..._free_table opposite of ..._init_opp? If so, you might want to
> > name them such that it is clear...
>
> Yes, it is opposite of that. Okay, so here is a new patch for this,
> lemme know if this looks
On 09/02, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> From: Viresh Kumar
> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:34:23 +0530
> Subject: [PATCH 2/3] PM / OPP: Prefix exported opp routines with dev_pm_opp_
>
> That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few
> routines didn't follow
Hi!
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpumask_init_opp_table);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_cpumask_init_opp);
Well... it starts to be rather long and repetitive.
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>*
>* OPPs might be populated at runtime,
Hi!
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_cpumask_init_opp_table);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_cpumask_init_opp);
Well... it starts to be rather long and repetitive.
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>*
>* OPPs might be populated at runtime,
That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few
recent additions didn't follow this, fix them.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 18 +-
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 10 +-
include/linux/pm_opp.h
That's the naming convention followed in most of opp core, but few
recent additions didn't follow this, fix them.
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 18 +-
10 matches
Mail list logo