On 05/27/2020 05:55 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2020 15:34:36 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> There is no way to proceed when requested register could not be searched in
>> arm64_ftr_reg[]. Requesting for a non present register would be an error as
>> well. Hence lets just
On Wed, 27 May 2020 15:34:36 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> There is no way to proceed when requested register could not be searched in
> arm64_ftr_reg[]. Requesting for a non present register would be an error as
> well. Hence lets just WARN_ON() when search fails in get_arm64_ftr_reg()
>
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:34:36PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> +/*
> + * get_arm64_ftr_reg - Looks up a feature register entry using
> + * its sys_reg() encoding. This calls get_arm64_ftr_reg_nowarn().
> + *
> + * returns - Upon success, matching ftr_reg entry for id.
> + * - NULL
There is no way to proceed when requested register could not be searched in
arm64_ftr_reg[]. Requesting for a non present register would be an error as
well. Hence lets just WARN_ON() when search fails in get_arm64_ftr_reg()
rather than checking for return value and doing a BUG_ON() instead in
4 matches
Mail list logo
