On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:33AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/2018 8:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:33AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/2018 8:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > > > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
On 1/31/2018 8:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
I think it was disabled together with
On 1/31/2018 8:15 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
I think it was disabled together with
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> > > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
> >
> > I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
> > (which we
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:15:39AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> > > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
> >
> > I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
> > (which we
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
>
> I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
> (which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
>
> But yes PERIOD could
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 07:59:41PM -0800, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> > PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
>
> I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
> (which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
>
> But yes PERIOD could
> Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
(which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
But yes PERIOD could probably be allowed.
-Andi
> Still, the part I am missing here, is why asking for
> PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD voids large PEBS.
I think it was disabled together with frequency mode
(which we could support too, but it's a bit more work)
But yes PERIOD could probably be allowed.
-Andi
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:48:18AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > >
> > > > The events in fixed mode could enable large PEBS. Events in freq mode
> > > > should
> > > > not enable large PEBS.
> > > > I think that
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:48:18AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > >
> > > > The events in fixed mode could enable large PEBS. Events in freq mode
> > > > should
> > > > not enable large PEBS.
> > > > I think that could be a
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:48:18AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
SNIP
> > >
> > > The events in fixed mode could enable large PEBS. Events in freq mode
> > > should
> > > not enable large PEBS.
> > > I think that could be a problem if some events try to enable large PEBS,
> > > while others not.
>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:48:18AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
SNIP
> > >
> > > The events in fixed mode could enable large PEBS. Events in freq mode
> > > should
> > > not enable large PEBS.
> > > I think that could be a problem if some events try to enable large PEBS,
> > > while others not.
>
On 1/30/2018 11:36 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30,
On 1/30/2018 11:36 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan
On 1/30/2018 10:04 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Kan
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 09:59:15AM -0500, Liang, Kan wrote:
>
>
> On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Kan Liang
> > > >
> > > > --
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced
On 1/30/2018 8:39 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
The previous
On 1/30/2018 4:16 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
The previous
On 1/30/2018 4:16 AM, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
Disabled PMU
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> >
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > --
> >
> > Changes since V2:
> > - Refined the changelog
> > - Introduced specific read
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 01:16:39AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
> >
> > From: Kan Liang
> >
> > --
> >
> > Changes since V2:
> > - Refined the changelog
> > - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
> >The previous generic
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang
>
> --
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Refined the changelog
> - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
>The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
>
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:29 AM, wrote:
>
> From: Kan Liang
>
> --
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Refined the changelog
> - Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
>The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
>Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS.
>
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS.
Handled the corner case when
From: Kan Liang
--
Changes since V2:
- Refined the changelog
- Introduced specific read function for large PEBS.
The previous generic PEBS read function is confusing.
Disabled PMU in pmu::read() path for large PEBS.
Handled the corner case when reload_times == 0.
- Modified the
32 matches
Mail list logo