Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table

2016-06-06 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 06-06-16, 23:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Is there any particular reason why patches [2-7/9] are separate? I just wanted them to be separately reviewable by platform driver owners. Nothing else. Will merge them in next version. -- viresh

Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table

2016-06-06 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > So all my patches are contained in two series. The first one is: > > [PATCH V3 0/8] cpufreq: cleanups and reorganization > > which I have sent this morning. It does some cleanup and shall be > applied regardless of this series. >

[PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table

2016-06-03 Thread Viresh Kumar
Hi Rafael, So all my patches are contained in two series. The first one is: [PATCH V3 0/8] cpufreq: cleanups and reorganization which I have sent this morning. It does some cleanup and shall be applied regardless of this series. This series improves the performance of cpufreq_frequency_table_ta