On 01/11/2013 03:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:19 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Wanlong Gao writes:
>>> On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao writes:
> */
> static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
>
On 01/11/2013 03:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:19 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:19 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Wanlong Gao writes:
> > On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >> Wanlong Gao writes:
> >>> */
> >>> static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
> >>> *skb)
> >>> {
> >>> - int txq =
On 01/10/2013 08:49 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Wanlong Gao writes:
>> On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>>> Wanlong Gao writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
*skb)
{
- int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ?
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 11:19 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
*skb)
{
-
On 01/10/2013 08:49 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
*skb)
{
- int txq =
Wanlong Gao writes:
> On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Wanlong Gao writes:
>>> */
>>> static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
>>> *skb)
>>> {
>>> - int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
>>> -
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff
*skb)
{
- int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
On 01/09/2013 09:52 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 06:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
>> On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>>> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
>>> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
>>> Fix this
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Wanlong Gao writes:
>> */
>> static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> -int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
>> - smp_processor_id();
>> +int txq = 0;
>> +
On 01/08/2013 06:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
>> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
>> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
>> Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per
Wanlong Gao writes:
> */
> static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
> - smp_processor_id();
> + int txq = 0;
> +
> + if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb))
> +
On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
> As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
> well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
> Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
> to find the mapping from CPU to
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue.
Cc: Rusty Russell
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
to find the mapping from CPU to the preferable virtual-queue.
Cc: Rusty Russell
On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu variable
to find the mapping from CPU to the
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
- smp_processor_id();
+ int txq = 0;
+
+ if
On 01/09/2013 07:31 AM, Rusty Russell wrote:
Wanlong Gao gaowanl...@cn.fujitsu.com writes:
*/
static u16 virtnet_select_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
-int txq = skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb) ? skb_get_rx_queue(skb) :
- smp_processor_id();
+int
On 01/08/2013 06:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by traversal the online CPUs, and create a per cpu
On 01/09/2013 09:52 AM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
On 01/08/2013 06:26 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 01/08/2013 06:07 PM, Wanlong Gao wrote:
As Michael mentioned, set affinity and select queue will not work very
well when CPU IDs are not consecutive, this can happen with hot unplug.
Fix this bug by
20 matches
Mail list logo
