Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding

2017-02-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27-02-17, 18:31, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:36:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > > their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is > > pretty much platform dependent and we

Re: [PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding

2017-02-27 Thread Rob Herring
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:36:33PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of > their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is > pretty much platform dependent and we may need to work with a wide range > of configu

[PATCH V3 1/7] PM / Domains: Introduce "performance-states" binding

2017-02-24 Thread Viresh Kumar
Some platforms have the capability to configure the performance state of their power domains. The process of configuring the performance state is pretty much platform dependent and we may need to work with a wide range of configurables. For some platforms, like Qcom, it can be a positive integer va