Hi Thomas,
On 06/09/2016:11:58:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> That's a lot of churn to fix that simple problem. The two liner below
> should fix that as well, right?
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Yes, that should fix. I was n't sure if "setting
Hi Thomas,
On 06/09/2016:11:58:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Pratyush Anand wrote:
>
> That's a lot of churn to fix that simple problem. The two liner below
> should fix that as well, right?
Thanks a lot for your reply.
Yes, that should fix. I was n't sure if "setting
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Pratyush Anand wrote:
That's a lot of churn to fix that simple problem. The two liner below
should fix that as well, right?
Thanks,
tglx
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index 43745cac0141..cb8dfc3ee012 100644
---
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Pratyush Anand wrote:
That's a lot of churn to fix that simple problem. The two liner below
should fix that as well, right?
Thanks,
tglx
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
index 43745cac0141..cb8dfc3ee012 100644
---
On 31/08/2016 at 12:56:17 +0800, Dave Young wrote :
> Hi, Pratyush,
>
> I'm not sure who is the maintainer to review and take the patches,
> In MATAINERS file, x86 hpet is orphaned. rtc-cmos may go to rtc
> maitianer Alessandro Zummo
>
> Ccing Andrew maybe he can also take the patches for
On 31/08/2016 at 12:56:17 +0800, Dave Young wrote :
> Hi, Pratyush,
>
> I'm not sure who is the maintainer to review and take the patches,
> In MATAINERS file, x86 hpet is orphaned. rtc-cmos may go to rtc
> maitianer Alessandro Zummo
>
> Ccing Andrew maybe he can also take the patches for
Hi, Pratyush,
I'm not sure who is the maintainer to review and take the patches,
In MATAINERS file, x86 hpet is orphaned. rtc-cmos may go to rtc
maitianer Alessandro Zummo
Ccing Andrew maybe he can also take the patches for orphaned component.
On 08/30/16 at 03:24pm, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi
Hi, Pratyush,
I'm not sure who is the maintainer to review and take the patches,
In MATAINERS file, x86 hpet is orphaned. rtc-cmos may go to rtc
maitianer Alessandro Zummo
Ccing Andrew maybe he can also take the patches for orphaned component.
On 08/30/16 at 03:24pm, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> Hi
Hi Dave,
On 30/08/2016:04:22:30 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Pratyush
>
> On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> > cmos_do_probe() could call
Hi Dave,
On 30/08/2016:04:22:30 PM, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Pratyush
>
> On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> > cmos_do_probe() could call
On 08/30/16 at 04:38pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 08/30/16 at 04:22pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi, Pratyush
> >
> > On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and
On 08/30/16 at 04:38pm, Dave Young wrote:
> On 08/30/16 at 04:22pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > Hi, Pratyush
> >
> > On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and
On 08/30/16 at 04:22pm, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Pratyush
>
> On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> > cmos_do_probe() could call
On 08/30/16 at 04:22pm, Dave Young wrote:
> Hi, Pratyush
>
> On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> > hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> > cmos_do_probe() could call
Hi, Pratyush
On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> cmos_do_probe() could call hpet_rtc_timer_init().
>
> So, neither hpet_default_delta nor
Hi, Pratyush
On 08/16/16 at 08:55am, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
> hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
> cmos_do_probe() could call hpet_rtc_timer_init().
>
> So, neither hpet_default_delta nor
We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
cmos_do_probe() could call hpet_rtc_timer_init().
So, neither hpet_default_delta nor hpet_t1_cmp is initialized by the time
interrupt is raised in the given
We have observed on few x86 machines with rtc-cmos device that
hpet_rtc_interrupt() is called just after irq registration and before
cmos_do_probe() could call hpet_rtc_timer_init().
So, neither hpet_default_delta nor hpet_t1_cmp is initialized by the time
interrupt is raised in the given
18 matches
Mail list logo