Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

2013-05-10 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 09-05-2013 22:28, amit daniel kachhap wrote: > Hi Eduardo, > > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Eduardo Valentin > wrote: >> On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >>> TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator. >>> For compatibility reasons it is allowed to prob

Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

2013-05-09 Thread amit daniel kachhap
Hi Eduardo, On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: >> TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator. >> For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without >> this regulator defined. >> >> Sign

Re: [PATCH V3 20/21] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

2013-05-09 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 07-05-2013 09:01, Amit Daniel Kachhap wrote: > TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator. > For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without > this regulator defined. > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park > Signed-off-by:

[PATCH V3 20/21] thermal: exynos: Support for TMU regulator defined at device tree

2013-05-07 Thread Amit Daniel Kachhap
TMU probe function now checks for a device tree defined regulator. For compatibility reasons it is allowed to probe driver even without this regulator defined. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap --- .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exy