On 16-10-15, 12:50, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> In the lines that follow this code we set the
> per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data) to point to the new policy. But if the
> subsequent cpu->get() fails, we goto out_exit_policy. But that label
> doesn't clean up the per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data). So, I think we need
On 10/16/2015 12:11 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
The sysfs policy directory is postfixed currently with the CPU number
for which the policy was created, which isn't necessarily the first CPU
in related_cpus mask.
To make it more consistent and predictable, lets postfix the policy with
the first cpu i
The sysfs policy directory is postfixed currently with the CPU number
for which the policy was created, which isn't necessarily the first CPU
in related_cpus mask.
To make it more consistent and predictable, lets postfix the policy with
the first cpu in related-cpus mask.
Suggested-by: Saravana K
3 matches
Mail list logo
