Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] x86/mbm : Intel Memory Bandwidth monitoring support

2016-02-17 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Vikas, On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Vikas Shivappa wrote: > Was wondering if you had any feedback on the MBM patches. These are almost a > complete rewrite (the core part 3/5 from Tony Luck). The reused parts are > mostly the declarations of datastructures. This has tried to address all your > comments on

Re: [PATCH V4 0/5] x86/mbm : Intel Memory Bandwidth monitoring support

2016-02-17 Thread Vikas Shivappa
Hello Thomas, Was wondering if you had any feedback on the MBM patches. These are almost a complete rewrite (the core part 3/5 from Tony Luck). The reused parts are mostly the declarations of datastructures. This has tried to address all your comments on V3 about the commenting, the core calc

[PATCH V4 0/5] x86/mbm : Intel Memory Bandwidth monitoring support

2016-02-10 Thread Vikas Shivappa
The V4 version of MBM is almost a complete rewrite of the prior versions. It tries to address all of Thomas earlier comments. The patch series has one preparatory patch for cqm and then 4 MBM patches. *Patches apply on 4.5-rc1*. Memory bandwitdh monitoring(MBM) provides OS/VMM a way to monitor ba