On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:20 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/24/2013 08:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
On 12/24/2013 08:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
+
+ if (bhrb_sw_filter & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> +
> >> + if (bhrb_sw_filter & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
> >> + /* XL-form instruction */
> >> +
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
+
+ if (bhrb_sw_filter PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
+ /* XL-form instruction */
+ if
On 12/24/2013 08:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
+
+ if (bhrb_sw_filter PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL) {
+ /*
On Tue, 2013-12-24 at 09:20 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/24/2013 08:59 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 16:31 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
+
+
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
>> to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
>> branch stack sampling framework.
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
branch stack sampling framework. These
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 14:15 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/10/2013 11:27 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >> This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
> >> ridiculous.
> >>
> >> To start with at the beginning
On 12/10/2013 11:27 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
>> ridiculous.
>>
>> To start with at the beginning of this routine we have:
>>
>> while (..) {
>> if (!val)
>>
On 12/10/2013 11:27 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
ridiculous.
To start with at the beginning of this routine we have:
while (..) {
if (!val)
break;
On Thu, 2013-12-12 at 14:15 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/10/2013 11:27 AM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
ridiculous.
To start with at the beginning of this routine
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
> ridiculous.
>
> To start with at the beginning of this routine we have:
>
> while (..) {
> if (!val)
> break;
> else {
> // Bulk of
On 12/09/2013 11:51 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
This code was already in need of some unindentation, and now it's just
ridiculous.
To start with at the beginning of this routine we have:
while (..) {
if (!val)
break;
else {
// Bulk of the logic
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
> to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
> branch stack sampling framework. These changes increase the number of
> branch filters
On Wed, 2013-04-12 at 10:32:40 UTC, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
branch stack sampling framework. These changes increase the number of
branch filters and
This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
branch stack sampling framework. These changes increase the number of
branch filters and their valid combinations on any powerpc64 server
platform with BHRB
This patch enables SW based post processing of BHRB captured branches
to be able to meet more user defined branch filtration criteria in perf
branch stack sampling framework. These changes increase the number of
branch filters and their valid combinations on any powerpc64 server
platform with BHRB
18 matches
Mail list logo
