On Tue, 18 Sep 2018 23:37:23 +0530, Dilip Kota wrote:
> SPI controller driver should maintain the maximum frequency
> of the controller instead of relying on device tree bindings.
> Because maximum frequency is specific property of SPI
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota
> ---
> Document
Quoting Dilip Kota (2018-09-18 11:07:23)
> SPI controller driver should maintain the maximum frequency
> of the controller instead of relying on device tree bindings.
> Because maximum frequency is specific property of SPI
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Bo
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:08 AM Dilip Kota wrote:
>
> SPI controller driver should maintain the maximum frequency
> of the controller instead of relying on device tree bindings.
> Because maximum frequency is specific property of SPI
> controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota
> ---
> Docu
SPI controller driver should maintain the maximum frequency
of the controller instead of relying on device tree bindings.
Because maximum frequency is specific property of SPI
controller.
Signed-off-by: Dilip Kota
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/qcom/qcom,geni-se.txt | 2 --
1 file cha
4 matches
Mail list logo
