Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: Convert existing drivers to use cpufreq_freq_transition_{begin|end}

2014-03-21 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 21 March 2014 13:18, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > Nitpick: Instead of using 'false' as an argument to _post_transition(), > you could use '0', since the argument is supposed to be an int. But that's > minor, I won't insist. You should :) I will update that with a Macro actually, to make it more

Re: [PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: Convert existing drivers to use cpufreq_freq_transition_{begin|end}

2014-03-21 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 03/21/2014 11:04 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to > target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called > cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). > > This patch converts existing drivers to use t

[PATCH V4 2/3] cpufreq: Convert existing drivers to use cpufreq_freq_transition_{begin|end}

2014-03-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
CPUFreq core has new infrastructure that would guarantee serialized calls to target() or target_index() callbacks. These are called cpufreq_freq_transition_begin() and cpufreq_freq_transition_end(). This patch converts existing drivers to use these new set of routines. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar