Re: [PATCH V4 2/9] PM / Domains: Use OPP tables for power-domains

2017-04-13 Thread Sudeep Holla
On 13/04/17 07:03, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-04-17, 17:58, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> >> >> On 20/03/17 09:32, Viresh Kumar wrote: >>> The OPP table bindings contains all the necessary fields to support >>> power-domains now. Update the power-domain bindings to allow >>> "operating-points-v2" to be

Re: [PATCH V4 2/9] PM / Domains: Use OPP tables for power-domains

2017-04-12 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 12-04-17, 17:58, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 20/03/17 09:32, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > The OPP table bindings contains all the necessary fields to support > > power-domains now. Update the power-domain bindings to allow > > "operating-points-v2" to be present within the power-domain node. > >

Re: [PATCH V4 2/9] PM / Domains: Use OPP tables for power-domains

2017-04-12 Thread Sudeep Holla
On 20/03/17 09:32, Viresh Kumar wrote: > The OPP table bindings contains all the necessary fields to support > power-domains now. Update the power-domain bindings to allow > "operating-points-v2" to be present within the power-domain node. > > Also allow consumer devices, that don't use OPP tabl

[PATCH V4 2/9] PM / Domains: Use OPP tables for power-domains

2017-03-20 Thread Viresh Kumar
The OPP table bindings contains all the necessary fields to support power-domains now. Update the power-domain bindings to allow "operating-points-v2" to be present within the power-domain node. Also allow consumer devices, that don't use OPP tables, to specify the parent power-domain's performanc