On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:12 AM Anson Huang wrote:
> >
> > The question is whether the #ifdef check in the header to test for MODULE
> > (only calling it if this particular soc has a built-in clk driver, which is
> > sufficient)
> > or for IS_MODULE(CONFIG_MXC_CLK) (call it if _any_ clk driver is
Hi, Arnd
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:40 AM Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Anson Huang
> wrote:
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk:
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 8:40 AM Dong Aisheng wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> >
> > I am fine of adding the '#ifndef MODULE' to imx_clk_disable_uart() and
> > imx_keep_uart_clocks_param()
>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Anson Huang wrote:
> >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common
> > > clock driver as module
>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:11 PM Anson Huang wrote:
>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> > driver as module
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:26 AM Anson Huang
> > wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > > @@ -143
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:26 AM Anson Huang
> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > @@ -143,16 +148,18 @@ void imx_cscmr1_fixup(u32 *val) static int
> > > > imx_kee
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:26 AM Anson Huang wrote:
[...]
> > > @@ -143,16 +148,18 @@ void imx_cscmr1_fixup(u32 *val)
> > > static int imx_keep_uart_clocks;
> > > static struct clk ** const *imx_uart_clocks;
> > >
> > > -static int __init imx_keep_uart_clocks_param(char *str)
> > > +static int __
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] clk: imx: Support building i.MX common clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:19 AM Anson Huang
> wrote:
> >
> > There are more and more requirements of building SoC specific drivers
> > as modules, add support for
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:19 AM Anson Huang wrote:
>
> There are more and more requirements of building SoC specific drivers
> as modules, add support for building i.MX common clock driver as module
> to meet the requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang
> ---
> Changes since V3:
> - ON
There are more and more requirements of building SoC specific drivers
as modules, add support for building i.MX common clock driver as module
to meet the requirement.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang
---
Changes since V3:
- ONLY include __setup_param() build for built-in, module build no need
10 matches
Mail list logo
