> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Anson Huang
> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > +{
> > > > + return platform_driver_register(&imx8qxp_lpcg_cl
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Anson Huang wrote:
[...]
> > > +{
> > > + return platform_driver_register(&imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_driver);
> > > +}
> > > +device_initcall(imx8qxp_lpcg_clk_init);
> >
> > Any reason to change to device_initcall which looks a bit strange?
> > Is it because the follow
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] clk: imx8qxp: Support building i.MX8QXP clock
> driver as module
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:20 AM Anson Huang
> wrote:
> >
> > Change configuration to "tristate", use device_initcall() instead of
> > builtin_platform_d
On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 10:20 AM Anson Huang wrote:
>
> Change configuration to "tristate", use device_initcall() instead
> of builtin_platform_driver(), add module author, description and
> license to support building i.MX8QXP clock drivers as module.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang
> ---
> Change
Change configuration to "tristate", use device_initcall() instead
of builtin_platform_driver(), add module author, description and
license to support building i.MX8QXP clock drivers as module.
Signed-off-by: Anson Huang
---
Changes since V3:
- use device_initcall() instead of builtin_plat
5 matches
Mail list logo