* Sricharan R [140108 05:20]:
> On Wednesday 08 January 2014 05:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > Oops, I noticed some errors on these:
> >
> > WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xcd0): Section mismatch in reference
> > from the function irqcrossbar_init() to the function
> >
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 05:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [140107 15:10]:
>> * Sricharan R [131229 22:30]:
>>> On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 December
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 05:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [140107 15:10]:
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [131229 22:30]:
On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [140108 05:20]:
On Wednesday 08 January 2014 05:25 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Oops, I noticed some errors on these:
WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.text+0xcd0): Section mismatch in reference
from the function irqcrossbar_init() to the function
* Tony Lindgren [140107 15:10]:
> * Sricharan R [131229 22:30]:
> > On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> > > On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> > >> On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> > >>> On Wednesday 18 December
* Sricharan R [131229 22:30]:
> On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> > On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> I
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [131229 22:30]:
On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
I
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [140107 15:10]:
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [131229 22:30]:
On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On
Hi Tony,
On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Sricharan,
>>
>> On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi
Hi Tony,
On Friday 27 December 2013 07:19 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Sricharan,
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Sricharan,
>
> On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
On Thursday 26 December 2013 11:14 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
Sricharan,
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a
Sricharan,
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Hi Thomas,
>>
>> On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
>>> the
Sricharan,
On Wednesday 25 December 2013 11:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
>> the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
>> requests
Hi Thomas,
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 02:49 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
requests lines
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
> the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
> requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
> time, so they have to be
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the controllers appropriately.
In such places a interrupt
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the interrupt
requests lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the controllers appropriately.
In such places a interrupt
20 matches
Mail list logo
