Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-10-03 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > On 9/29/2018 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > Reinette, > > > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > >> I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no > >> objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix. > >> > >

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-10-03 Thread Reinette Chatre
Hi Thomas, On 9/29/2018 10:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Reinette, > > On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no >> objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix. >> >> If I understand the tip branches correctly th

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Reinette, On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > I interpreted Thomas and Peter's responses to mean that there are no > objections for this to be included in v4.19 as a fix. > > If I understand the tip branches correctly the core patch seems to be > headed to v4.19 while the rest (excludin

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-29 Thread Reinette Chatre
On 9/27/2018 11:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:39:01PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> >>> Dear Maintainers, >> >> Sorry for replying late. >> >>> On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:2

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-27 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 10:39:01PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > > > Dear Maintainers, > > Sorry for replying late. > > > On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > > >> Rein

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-27 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Dear Maintainers, Sorry for replying late. > On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > >> Reinette Chatre (6): > >> perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failu

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-21 Thread Reinette Chatre
Dear Maintainers, On 9/20/2018 7:11 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: >> Reinette Chatre (6): >> perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure >> perf/x86: Add helper to obtain performance counter index >> x86/intel_r

Re: [PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-20 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 10:29:05AM -0700, Reinette Chatre wrote: > Reinette Chatre (6): > perf/core: Add sanity check to deal with pinned event failure > perf/x86: Add helper to obtain performance counter index > x86/intel_rdt: Remove local register variables > x86/intel_rdt: Create require

[PATCH V5 0/6] perf and x86/intel_rdt: Fix lack of coordination with perf

2018-09-19 Thread Reinette Chatre
Dear Maintainers, This new series fixing the lack of coordination between the pseudo-locking measurement code and perf addresses all feedback received up to and including V4. Changes since V4: - Move the helper to obtain the performance counter index (x86_perf_rdpmc_index()) to arch/x86/events/