On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:21:40 +0800
"Li, Aubrey" wrote:
> On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote:
> > From: "David E. Box"
> >
> > Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it
> > exists.
> > Provide dummy functions to allow these modules to compile and load on the
> >
On Mon, 03 Mar 2014 15:21:40 +0800
Li, Aubrey aubrey...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote:
From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com
Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it
exists.
Provide dummy functions to allow these
On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote:
> From: "David E. Box"
>
> Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it exists.
> Provide dummy functions to allow these modules to compile and load on the
> platforms where it doesn't exist.
This is not the right way, I think.
We
On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote:
From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com
Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it exists.
Provide dummy functions to allow these modules to compile and load on the
platforms where it doesn't exist.
This is not the
From: "David E. Box"
Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it exists.
Provide dummy functions to allow these modules to compile and load on the
platforms where it doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box
---
arch/x86/include/asm/iosf_mbi.h | 33
From: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com
Some loadable modules only need IOSF access on the platforms where it exists.
Provide dummy functions to allow these modules to compile and load on the
platforms where it doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: David E. Box david.e@linux.intel.com
---
6 matches
Mail list logo
