On Thu, 2017-09-21 at 15:16 -0400, Al Cooper wrote:
> Kishon,
>
> I ran checkpatch on all my patches before submitting them and didn't
> get any warnings. It looks like you may be running checkpatch with the
> "--subjective" option. Is this a requirement and if so are there any
> other checkpatch
Kishon,
I ran checkpatch on all my patches before submitting them and didn't
get any warnings. It looks like you may be running checkpatch with the
"--subjective" option. Is this a requirement and if so are there any
other checkpatch options I should be using?
Thanks
Al
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4
Hi,
On Saturday 02 September 2017 07:45 AM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 08/25/2017 10:51 AM, Al Cooper wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper
>
> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli
I get the following checkpatch warning
CHECK: Macro argument reuse 'reg' - possible side-effects?
#110: FILE: include/
On 08/25/2017 10:51 AM, Al Cooper wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Al Cooper
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli
> ---
> drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c| 12
> include/linux/soc/brcmstb/brcmstb.h | 10 ++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/c
Signed-off-by: Al Cooper
---
drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c| 12
include/linux/soc/brcmstb/brcmstb.h | 10 ++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c b/drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/common.c
index b6195fd..184dbf5 100644
--- a/drivers/
5 matches
Mail list logo