* Sricharan R [140205 06:13]:
> Tony,
>
> On Wednesday 05 February 2014 06:41 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 February 2014 09:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Sricharan R wrote:
> I already have your reviewed-by tag for the first patch in this series.
>
>
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 07:41 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Tony,
>
> On Wednesday 05 February 2014 06:41 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> On Tuesday 04 February 2014 09:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Sricharan R wrote:
> I already have your reviewed-by tag for the f
Tony,
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 06:41 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 February 2014 09:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Sricharan R wrote:
I already have your reviewed-by tag for the first patch in this series.
Kevin was pointing out that irqchip maint
On Tuesday 04 February 2014 09:44 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Sricharan R wrote:
>>> I already have your reviewed-by tag for the first patch in this series.
>>>
>>> Kevin was pointing out that irqchip maintainer tag is needed for this patch
>>> as well
>>> to be merged. We are
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014, Sricharan R wrote:
> > I already have your reviewed-by tag for the first patch in this series.
> >
> > Kevin was pointing out that irqchip maintainer tag is needed for this patch
> > as well
> > to be merged. We are planning to take this series through arm-soc tree.
> >
> > C
Hi Thomas,
On Thursday 16 January 2014 03:52 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
>> Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
>> the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
>> interrupt lines from
Hi Thomas,
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 03:57 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
> Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
> the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
> interrupt lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
> time, so they have to be muxed to
Hi Felipe,
On Friday 27 December 2013 01:31 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:57:23PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>> +static const struct of_device_id crossbar_match[] __initconst = {
>> +{ .compatible = "ti,irq-crossbar" },
>> +{}
>> +};
>> +
>> +int irqcrossbar_
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 03:57:23PM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
> +static const struct of_device_id crossbar_match[] __initconst = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,irq-crossbar" },
> + {}
> +};
> +
> +int irqcrossbar_init(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np;
> + np = of_find_matching_n
Some socs have a large number of interrupts requests to service
the needs of its many peripherals and subsystems. All of the
interrupt lines from the subsystems are not needed at the same
time, so they have to be muxed to the irq-controller appropriately.
In such places a interrupt controllers are
10 matches
Mail list logo
