> Il giorno 05 set 2017, alle ore 23:02, Shaohua Li ha
> scritto:
>
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk,
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 09:12:20AM +0800, Joseph Qi wrote:
> Hi Shaohua,
>
> On 17/9/6 05:02, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
> >>
> >>> Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha
> >>> scritto:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> cgroup sti
Hi Shaohua,
On 17/9/6 05:02, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but
>>> not
>>> much for
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
>
> > Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but
> > not
> > much for SSD. This patch set try to add a conservative li
> Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
>
> Hi,
>
> cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but not
> much for SSD. This patch set try to add a conservative limit for blk-throttle.
> It isn't a proportional scheduling, but can help prioritiz
Hi,
cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but not
much for SSD. This patch set try to add a conservative limit for blk-throttle.
It isn't a proportional scheduling, but can help prioritize cgroups. There are
several advantages we choose blk-throttle:
- blk-throttle
6 matches
Mail list logo