On 06/23/2016 12:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 06/23/2016 10:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Is it really required to do this per interrupt rather than providing per cpu
statistics of interrupts which arrived in the last X seconds or whatever
timefram
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 06/23/2016 10:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Is it really required to do this per interrupt rather than providing per cpu
> > statistics of interrupts which arrived in the last X seconds or whatever
> > timeframe is relevant for this.
>
> Perhaps
On 06/23/2016 10:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The interrupt framework gives a lot of information about each interrupt.
It does not keep track of when those interrupts occur though.
This patch provides a mean to record the elapsed time between success
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> The interrupt framework gives a lot of information about each interrupt.
>
> It does not keep track of when those interrupts occur though.
>
> This patch provides a mean to record the elapsed time between successive
> interrupt occurrences in a per-IRQ
The interrupt framework gives a lot of information about each interrupt.
It does not keep track of when those interrupts occur though.
This patch provides a mean to record the elapsed time between successive
interrupt occurrences in a per-IRQ per-CPU circular buffer to help with the
prediction of
5 matches
Mail list logo