On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 13:21 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:02:32AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
> > platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
> > devices to platform bus by default, if the
On Mon, 2014-05-26 at 13:21 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:02:32AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
devices to platform bus by default, if the device
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:02:32AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
> platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
> devices to platform bus by default, if the device
> 1. has _HID.
> 2. does not have a scan handler attached.
>
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 02:02:32AM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
devices to platform bus by default, if the device
1. has _HID.
2. does not have a scan handler attached.
3. is
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
devices to platform bus by default, if the device
1. has _HID.
2. does not have a scan handler attached.
3. is not SPB slave device, which should be enumerated by its parent.
Because of the growing demand for enumerating ACPI devices to
platform bus, this patch changes the code to enumerate ACPI
devices to platform bus by default, if the device
1. has _HID.
2. does not have a scan handler attached.
3. is not SPB slave device, which should be enumerated by its parent.
6 matches
Mail list logo