On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:33:59AM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> > Below fixup works fine on APM platform.
>> > Do you want me to send this fixup as part of next revision of the
>> > patch or will you apply it yourself? (For later case, you hav
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:33:59AM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> > Below fixup works fine on APM platform.
> > Do you want me to send this fixup as part of next revision of the
> > patch or will you apply it yourself? (For later case, you have my ack)
>
> Any comments? Do I need to send the fix-up
Hi Will,
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Vinayak,
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:09:51AM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>>> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
>>
>> Getting c
Hi Will,
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Vinayak,
>
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:09:51AM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
>> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
>
> Getting closer...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale
>> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan
>> -
Hi Vinayak,
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 10:09:51AM +, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
Getting closer...
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale
> Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 108
> +-
Add support for irq registration when pmu interrupt is percpu.
Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale
Signed-off-by: Tuan Phan
---
arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 108 +---
1 file changed, 78 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
