On 2016/11/30 0:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
> wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>>
>> On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> wrote:
On 2016/11/30 0:26, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
> wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>>
>> On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>>> wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
> On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Agustin,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Agustin Vega-Frias
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
> On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Agustin,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
Hi Rafael,
On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion
Hi Rafael,
On 2016-11-29 07:43, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
It would be great
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2016-11-29 07:11, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
in a
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2016-11-29 07:11, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
in a
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> Hi Agustin,
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
>> It would be great if you can comment
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:11 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi
wrote:
> Hi Agustin,
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
>> Hi Rafael,
>>
>> Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
>> It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
> It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
> in a certain way.
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On 2016-11-25 06:40,
Hi Agustin,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
> It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
> in a certain way.
>
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On 2016-11-25 06:40,
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
in a certain way.
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2016-11-25 06:40, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:15:48PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
Hi Rafael,
Can you chime in on Lorenzo's feedback and the discussion below?
It would be great if you can comment on the reason ACPI does things
in a certain way.
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2016-11-25 06:40, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
Hi Agustin,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:15:48PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi
Hi Agustin,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:15:48PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource
> > *ares, int index,
> > {
> > struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
> > struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq;
> > +
Hi Agustin,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:15:48PM +, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[...]
> > @@ -448,6 +449,7 @@ bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource
> > *ares, int index,
> > {
> > struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
> > struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq;
> > +
Hi Agustin,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:59:34PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> When an Extended IRQ Resource contains a valid ResourceSource
> use it to map the IRQ on the domain associated with the ACPI
> device referenced.
>
> With this in place an irqchip driver can create its domain using
Hi Agustin,
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 04:59:34PM -0500, Agustin Vega-Frias wrote:
> When an Extended IRQ Resource contains a valid ResourceSource
> use it to map the IRQ on the domain associated with the ACPI
> device referenced.
>
> With this in place an irqchip driver can create its domain using
When an Extended IRQ Resource contains a valid ResourceSource
use it to map the IRQ on the domain associated with the ACPI
device referenced.
With this in place an irqchip driver can create its domain using
irq_domain_create_linear and pass the device fwnode to create
the domain mapping. When
When an Extended IRQ Resource contains a valid ResourceSource
use it to map the IRQ on the domain associated with the ACPI
device referenced.
With this in place an irqchip driver can create its domain using
irq_domain_create_linear and pass the device fwnode to create
the domain mapping. When
20 matches
Mail list logo