On 6/23/2018 6:07 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core tip/auto-latest next-20180622]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve
On 6/23/2018 6:07 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on v4.18-rc1]
> [cannot apply to tip/x86/core tip/auto-latest next-20180622]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve
There is no simple yes/no test to determine if pseudo-locking was
successful. In order to test pseudo-locking we expose a debugfs file for
each pseudo-locked region that will record the latency of reading the
pseudo-locked memory at a stride of 32 bytes (hardcoded). These numbers
will give us an
There is no simple yes/no test to determine if pseudo-locking was
successful. In order to test pseudo-locking we expose a debugfs file for
each pseudo-locked region that will record the latency of reading the
pseudo-locked memory at a stride of 32 bytes (hardcoded). These numbers
will give us an
4 matches
Mail list logo
