On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:47:20PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Yonghong Song wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 1/14/21 2:02 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:05:33PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri Olsa w
On 1/26/21 12:52 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:47:20PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Yonghong Song wrote:
On 1/14/21 2:02 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:05:33PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:44 PM Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/14/21 2:02 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:05:33PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> >>
On 1/14/21 2:02 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:05:33PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 1/14/21 5:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
It's possible to have other build id types (othe
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 01:05:33PM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/14/21 5:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > It's possible to have other build id types (other than def
On 1/14/21 12:01 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
On 1/14/21 5:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
It's possible to have other build id types (other than default SHA1).
Currently there's also ld support for MD5 build id.
Currently, bpf build_id base
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:56:33AM -0800, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
>
> On 1/14/21 5:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > It's possible to have other build id types (other than default SHA1).
> > Currently there's also ld support for MD5 build id.
>
> Currently, bpf build_id based stackmap does not returns
On 1/14/21 5:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
It's possible to have other build id types (other than default SHA1).
Currently there's also ld support for MD5 build id.
Currently, bpf build_id based stackmap does not returns the size of
the build_id. Did you see an issue here? I guess user space can c
It's possible to have other build id types (other than default SHA1).
Currently there's also ld support for MD5 build id.
Adding size argument to build_id_parse function, that returns (if defined)
size of the parsed build id, so we can recognize the build id type.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov
Cc: Song
9 matches
Mail list logo