Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/10] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation for Landlock

On 8/1/19 10:03 AM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >>> +Ptrace restrictions >>> +--- >>> + >>> +A landlocked process has less privileges than a non-landlocked process and >>> must >>> +then be subject to additional restrictions when manipulating another >>> process. >>> +To be allowed to

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/10] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation for Landlock

Thanks for this spelling fixes. Some comments: On 31/07/2019 03:53, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 7/21/19 2:31 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: >> This documentation can be built with the Sphinx framework. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün >> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski >> Cc: Daniel

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v10 10/10] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation for Landlock

On 7/21/19 2:31 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote: > This documentation can be built with the Sphinx framework. > > Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün > Cc: Alexei Starovoitov > Cc: Andy Lutomirski > Cc: Daniel Borkmann > Cc: David S. Miller > Cc: James Morris > Cc: Jonathan Corbet > Cc: Kees Cook >

[PATCH bpf-next v10 10/10] landlock: Add user and kernel documentation for Landlock

This documentation can be built with the Sphinx framework. Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün Cc: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Daniel Borkmann Cc: David S. Miller Cc: James Morris Cc: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Kees Cook Cc: Serge E. Hallyn --- Changes since v9: * update with expected