Thanks, Alexei and Andrii and other reviewers for the comments. It's a
pleasure to work with you and contribute to bpf.
Hao
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:16 PM Alexei Starovoitov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:48 PM Hao Luo wrote:
> >
> > Ah, this is the bug in pahole described in
> >
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 11:48 PM Hao Luo wrote:
>
> Ah, this is the bug in pahole described in
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/20/1862. I proposed a fix [1] but it
> hasn't reached pahole's master branch. Let me ask Arnaldo to see if he
> is OK merging it.
>
> [1]
Ah, this is the bug in pahole described in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/20/1862. I proposed a fix [1] but it
hasn't reached pahole's master branch. Let me ask Arnaldo to see if he
is OK merging it.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/dwarves/msg00451.html
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 9:36 PM Alexei
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 4:50 PM Hao Luo wrote:
>
> v3 -> v4:
> - Rebasing
> - Cast bpf_[per|this]_cpu_ptr's parameter to void __percpu * before
>passing into per_cpu_ptr.
Looks good, but doesn't work:
./test_progs -t ksyms_btf
test_ksyms_btf:PASS:kallsyms_fopen 0 nsec
v3 -> v4:
- Rebasing
- Cast bpf_[per|this]_cpu_ptr's parameter to void __percpu * before
passing into per_cpu_ptr.
v2 -> v3:
- Rename functions and variables in verifier for better readability.
- Stick to logging message convention in libbpf.
- Move bpf_per_cpu_ptr and bpf_this_cpu_ptr
5 matches
Mail list logo